Comparison
CRICKET LIVE UPDATE INDIA vs πππ π¬π’π‘π’ π£π₯π’π π’ ππ’ππ
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
CRICKET LIVE UPDATE INDIA@cricketliveupdatesindiaπππ π¬π’π‘π’ π£π₯π’π π’ ππ’ππ@yono_all_app_code
| Metric | @cricketliveupdatesindia | @yono_all_app_code |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 18,231 | 95,221 |
| Avg views | 4,065 | 21,600 |
| Engagement rate | 22.3% | 22.7% |
| 30-day growth | β | β |
| Language | Italiano | Italiano |
| Category | β | β |
| Channel age | 2003 days | 2160 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@cricketliveupdatesindia
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@yono_all_app_code
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.